DOD - FX22 Vibro Thang  [schematic]

All about modern commercial stompbox circuits from Electro Harmonix over MXR, Boss and Ibanez into the nineties.

Re: DOD - FX22 Vibro Thang

Postby induction » 12 Apr 2016, 14:33

normal elco actually conduct in the reverse direction, two 1uF polarized act like they each have a diode in parallel with them that conducts when the voltage is backwards for that one cap.


Yes, that explains why two polar caps can be attached in series to create a non-polar cap. But that doesn't explain how the math for adding caps in series has somehow changed. Why would it be different for 1u caps than for any other value?
induction
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 07 Feb 2012, 21:47
Has thanked: 63 times
Have thanks: 132 times

Re: DOD - FX22 Vibro Thang

Postby deltafred » 13 Apr 2016, 22:28

induction wrote:But that doesn't explain how the math for adding caps in series has somehow changed.


-----l C1 l------l C2 l-----

Ctotal = (C1xC2)/(C1+C2)
C1 = C2 so we can rearrange this to
Ctotal = (C1 x C1)/(2 x C1)
Which simplifies to
Ctotal = C1 / 2

So 2 equal value caps in series gives you a cap half the value of one of them (unlike 2 resistors in series where you add the values). It is capacitors in parallel where you add the values to determine the resultant value.
Politics is the art of so plucking the goose as to obtain the most feathers with the least squawking. - R.G. 2011
Jeez, she's an ugly bastard, she makes my socks hurt. I hope it's no ones missus here. - Ice-9 2012
User avatar
deltafred
Opamp Operator
 
Posts: 1440
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:16
Location: Yorkshire, England, UK
Has thanked: 372 times
Have thanks: 257 times

Re: DOD - FX22 Vibro Thang GUTS - no schema yet

Postby czech-one-2 » 04 Feb 2017, 18:19

mictester wrote:
trubac wrote:Thanks fior answering !
No my modified one works perfectly independantly of the mod.
The problem is the new one on wich the speed doesn't go as fast as on my first one.
By reading the diagram kindly post by DoctorSound I can 't really see what could be the culprit ...
RPMS controls the speed .... DROP the depth.
[ Image ]


What nonsense from DOD!! It's the tolerance of C25 - most electrolytic capacitors have a wide tolerance - often as much as 20%! Your 4µ7 could be as low as 3µ7 or as high as 5µ6. If it's higher in value, the oscillator will run more slowly....


Thanks! 2.2 was the perfect value! Slow to hummingbird! :-)
czech-one-2
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 102
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 18:16
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 1 time

Re: DOD - FX22 Vibro Thang

Postby roseblood11 » 04 Feb 2017, 18:44

Can't believe that there's no layout yet.
This pedal is so underrated.
Madbean, Sabrotone, Tagboardeffects, where are you?
roseblood11
Tube Twister
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: 23 Aug 2008, 15:21
Has thanked: 346 times
Have thanks: 309 times

Re: DOD - FX22 Vibro Thang

Postby albru80 » 05 Feb 2017, 12:32

I've done one last year.
It's on the main page:
http://tagboardeffects.blogspot.fr/2016 ... mment-form
albru80
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 10 May 2010, 19:33
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 49 times

Re: DOD - FX22 Vibro Thang

Postby roseblood11 » 05 Feb 2017, 18:32

Great! Why didn't I see that?

Are schematic and layout really verified?
Has anybody compared his built with the original pedal?

It looks a bit strange that R44 and R45 (4k7 and 7k5) are in series..
roseblood11
Tube Twister
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: 23 Aug 2008, 15:21
Has thanked: 346 times
Have thanks: 309 times

Re: DOD - FX22 Vibro Thang

Postby cerelac » 17 Oct 2018, 15:30

roseblood11 wrote:
It looks a bit strange that R44 and R45 (4k7 and 7k5) are in series..


maybe thei were tinkering after production until they got the max depth right? a trimmer would have been better

anyways, not a very good effect, the idea is good (the VCA/VCF thing), but the sound is kind of muddy, there are way better phasers
cerelac
 
Posts: 10
Joined: 16 Aug 2007, 12:03
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time

Previous

Return to Modern Stompbox Effects (1975 - ...)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fender3D, oldtreecutter13, snakepit86 and 15 guests