BAJA AC30TB overdrive pedal project 110218 [documentation]
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
I made a further two changes to the Top Boost version - reduce the input gain stage even further by changing the 2k7 for a 1k2 resistor - this allows the input stage to have a similar headroom to the actual tube amplifier input stage.
Also, I increased the gain of the second stage that drives the passive tone stack by changing the 2k7 to 15k.
Two minor changes that you can make or just use the original schematic - your choice
cheers
have fun
bajaman and the rev 1 vero for the Top Boost version
Also, I increased the gain of the second stage that drives the passive tone stack by changing the 2k7 to 15k.
Two minor changes that you can make or just use the original schematic - your choice
cheers
have fun
bajaman and the rev 1 vero for the Top Boost version
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- Frank_NH
- Solder Soldier
Thanks for the heads up on the vbias cap! I thought there should have been something there.bajaman wrote:hello Frank_NHHey Bajaman - I have a quick question. For fun, I decided last night to simulate your AC-30 Normal channel circuit in LTSpice. I was surprised to see that the signal (a 1 kHz sine wave at 0.1 V amplitude) was becoming a square wave after the power section op amp stage (with the 10K resistor in the feedback loop), and the waveform reminded me of a fuzz circuit response. The gain pot resistance was set relatively low. Is this how the real amp behaves? I've seen online demos of AC-30s and they seem somewhat cleanish until you put the channel volume past noon.
You are quite right - i originally designed this project as an overdrive / distortion pedal but to obtain the same onset of clipping behaviour as the actual amplifier requires the op amp gains to be a lot lower - one of the penalties when one is working with 9vDC versus 300vDC (or thereabouts) in the actual vacuum tube amplifier. To give a much better approximation to the amplifier involves reducing the input and driver stage op amps gains considerably. Here is the revised schematic for a far more accurate representation - it still retains the same important phase and frequency response correlation to the actual amplifier but at a much lower output level.
enjoy
bajaman
ps: It is most important ito add the 1uf capacitor in the low impedance vbias op amp stage (to the original posted schematic as well ) - without this the pedal becomes a great white noise generator!
Your mods did the trick. Here's the output from LTSpice for a 0.1V 800 Hz input sine wave, with the gain at 50%, tone cut off, and volume at 100%. The clipped wave form has nice rounded corners now. The 600 mV output amplitude (16 dB gain) is limited by the clipping, but I guess you could mod the final JFET buffer to a simple gain stage if you wanted more oomph.
I'll try to get this built to see how it sounds. Thanks again.
- roseblood11
- Tube Twister
Is the top boost pedal optimized for overdrive, or can it replicate the typical Vox clean sound, maybe with the mentioned Celestion Blue Sim?
If I'd build this, I'd add a booster in front of the circuit that can cut bass, maybe the Boss FA-1 (which I use a lot with real Vox amps).
If I'd build this, I'd add a booster in front of the circuit that can cut bass, maybe the Boss FA-1 (which I use a lot with real Vox amps).
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
YesIs the top boost pedal optimized for overdrive, or can it replicate the typical Vox clean sound, maybe with the mentioned Celestion Blue Sim?
This latest revision 1 performs just like the actual amplifier - at low gain settings it will "cut your ears off" when the treble control is on max - then the tone cut control warms it up nicely
Very clean until you turn up the gain
cheers
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
link to the above mentioned Celestion blue speaker response simulator which I had completely forgotten I had designed back in 2013
https://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic ... it#p225487
If using with the Top Boost or Normal circuits in this thread you can just connect the vbias point to the existing voltage divider or op amp buffered divider vbias point
cheers
bajaman
https://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic ... it#p225487
If using with the Top Boost or Normal circuits in this thread you can just connect the vbias point to the existing voltage divider or op amp buffered divider vbias point
cheers
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
Here you go - built it and verified - works very well - not a cabsim but an a speaker response load sim designed to duplicate the frequency response caused by the speaker load on a tube output stage.
cheers
bajaman
I had completely forgotten this design, so many thanks to HENK for pointing this one out cheers
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- Frank_NH
- Solder Soldier
Hey all,
I finished my Normal Channel vero build (the layout is attached below). Fired up first thing and didn't need any debugging. I did make one modification, changing the 470n cap to 47n (which is the coupling cap most AC-30 schematics show before the normal channel volume pot). It reduces the gain on the bass somewhat, which is a good thing (see below). Also added a reverse polarity diode, FWIW.
The sound is pretty gainy and exactly what you would expect from the AC-30 Normal channel - which is to say "wooly". That is, it allows a lot of bass frequencies through, just like the old AC-30s. It's not a great tone when overdriven (at least for for me) - until you add a treble booster in front. It then sounds GREAT! I am using a ROG Omega Booster pedal I built a while back and it's a good match for the amp sim as it can greatly reduce the bass frequencies going into the pedal. You could also try a Greg Fryer treble booster or a Rangemaster, but make sure you can control the level as you don't want to slam the JFET and first op amp with a huge signal.
With a treble booster in front, the treble cut control becomes useful for taming any shrillness. Works pretty well for that. I didn't try the speaker sim Bajaman introduced above, and that may provide some subtle shading of the tone. I would propose putting that circuit on a separate vero so you can experiment. Other cab sims would be interesting to try as well.
The vero is verified but let me know if any problems are found. Cheers!
I finished my Normal Channel vero build (the layout is attached below). Fired up first thing and didn't need any debugging. I did make one modification, changing the 470n cap to 47n (which is the coupling cap most AC-30 schematics show before the normal channel volume pot). It reduces the gain on the bass somewhat, which is a good thing (see below). Also added a reverse polarity diode, FWIW.
The sound is pretty gainy and exactly what you would expect from the AC-30 Normal channel - which is to say "wooly". That is, it allows a lot of bass frequencies through, just like the old AC-30s. It's not a great tone when overdriven (at least for for me) - until you add a treble booster in front. It then sounds GREAT! I am using a ROG Omega Booster pedal I built a while back and it's a good match for the amp sim as it can greatly reduce the bass frequencies going into the pedal. You could also try a Greg Fryer treble booster or a Rangemaster, but make sure you can control the level as you don't want to slam the JFET and first op amp with a huge signal.
With a treble booster in front, the treble cut control becomes useful for taming any shrillness. Works pretty well for that. I didn't try the speaker sim Bajaman introduced above, and that may provide some subtle shading of the tone. I would propose putting that circuit on a separate vero so you can experiment. Other cab sims would be interesting to try as well.
The vero is verified but let me know if any problems are found. Cheers!
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
Hi Frank_NH
cheers
bajaman
Agreed but i am using a 100k channel volume pot (not the 1M as the actual amplifier uses) so the 470n capacitor is the correct value to use in this application.I did make one modification, changing the 470n cap to 47n (which is the coupling cap most AC-30 schematics show before the normal channel volume pot)
cheers
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- Frank_NH
- Solder Soldier
Hi Bajaman,
The AC-30 schematics I've seen have a normal channel 500K volume pot (see attached image) and I agree a higher cap value may be technically correct for 100K, but the 47n seemed to tame some of the sub-100 Hz lows (without the treble boost). I suppose I could change to a B500K volume pot to keep the corner frequency the same. However, if you're placing the treble boost up front, it probably won't matter too much since the lows are not present at the input.
There's also a 220K resistor at the output (lug 2) of the volume pot which is used with all channels on the amp prior to mixing and sending the combined signal to the power amp. But my LTSPice model showed that this didn't do too much except bump the the signal level down. But if you wanted to more authentic, you could add it in. Your speaker sim actually bumps the signal up a bit, so no problem with the output level if you add that.
Now, I'm off to breadboard a bunch of treble boosters...one thing leads to another!
The AC-30 schematics I've seen have a normal channel 500K volume pot (see attached image) and I agree a higher cap value may be technically correct for 100K, but the 47n seemed to tame some of the sub-100 Hz lows (without the treble boost). I suppose I could change to a B500K volume pot to keep the corner frequency the same. However, if you're placing the treble boost up front, it probably won't matter too much since the lows are not present at the input.
There's also a 220K resistor at the output (lug 2) of the volume pot which is used with all channels on the amp prior to mixing and sending the combined signal to the power amp. But my LTSPice model showed that this didn't do too much except bump the the signal level down. But if you wanted to more authentic, you could add it in. Your speaker sim actually bumps the signal up a bit, so no problem with the output level if you add that.
Now, I'm off to breadboard a bunch of treble boosters...one thing leads to another!
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
Hi Frank_NH
my error - thanks - I forgot the Vox uses 500k volume pots, so the correct value capacitor should be 235n when using a 100k pot - 220n will suffice
cheers
bajaman
my error - thanks - I forgot the Vox uses 500k volume pots, so the correct value capacitor should be 235n when using a 100k pot - 220n will suffice
cheers
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
and here is the schematic for the AC30BM treble boost section
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- Frank_NH
- Solder Soldier
Thanks Bajaman. That's the classic Brian May treble boost with a switchable gain option. Definitely need an output control pot as it produces over 30 dB gain, and the amp sim will definitely be clipping the first op amp. I suppose you could put some clipping diodes (LEDs) before the first stage in the amp sim, like the Runoffgroove Britannia, to control the signal - I'll have to check that out in LTSpice. Meanwhile, I was been playing around with different clipping transistors, and BC107B seemed to work well - then I realized the BC547 and BC107 are pretty much the same .
Right now, my Runoffgroove Omega booster pedal is doing a fine job as the front end to the amp sim, so if anyone builds it, that is one viable option for the treble booster. Ultimately, I may finish this up as an all-in-one pedal with the treble boost in front (and always on) and controls for boost level, amp volume (gain), treble cut, and output level.
Right now, my Runoffgroove Omega booster pedal is doing a fine job as the front end to the amp sim, so if anyone builds it, that is one viable option for the treble booster. Ultimately, I may finish this up as an all-in-one pedal with the treble boost in front (and always on) and controls for boost level, amp volume (gain), treble cut, and output level.
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 2050 times
okay - just change the 47k output resistor to a 50k linear potentiometer ( or preset potentiometer ) and take the signal out from the wiper - or two fixed resistors as a voltage divider ( try 39k and 8k2 perhaps )Definitely need an output control pot as it produces over 30 dB gain, and the amp sim will definitely be clipping the first op amp
cheers
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- Frank_NH
- Solder Soldier
Quick update. Tried the Brian May treble booster on the breadboard with a 50K volume pot and piped it into the amp sim, and it worked fine. Interestingly, this is a very similar configuration to that used on the Vox VBM1 amp produced some years back (Vox's take on the solid state "Deacy Amp"). However, I actually think the Omega booster sounded a little better. May ultimately go that route for an all-in-one build. Haven't tried the speaker sim circuit yet.
I also compared the sound to the ROG Britannia, which I had built a few years ago. The Britannia has a wider range of tones but can't quite get the saturated distortion that the present circuit can. So build this a your "Brian May in a box" pedal and you'll be all set to rock out to "Bohemian Rhapsody"!
I also compared the sound to the ROG Britannia, which I had built a few years ago. The Britannia has a wider range of tones but can't quite get the saturated distortion that the present circuit can. So build this a your "Brian May in a box" pedal and you'll be all set to rock out to "Bohemian Rhapsody"!
- Frank_NH
- Solder Soldier
OK! Here's the logical conclusion of my efforts to simulate Brian May's rig - the Q-Drive!
I settled for the ROG Omega as the treble booster and integrated it into my previous vero layout for the AC-30 Normal channel sim. Just finished my build tonight and it sounds GREAT! A very versatile distortion. With the Range and Boost set low and the amp Gain up near full, you get a very convincing Brian May sound (well with the right guitar, pickups, Brian's talent etc. ). Can't wait to box my prototype!
You can substitute other transistors if you want (e.g. BS170 for the MOSFET) but mind the pinouts.
Have fun!
I settled for the ROG Omega as the treble booster and integrated it into my previous vero layout for the AC-30 Normal channel sim. Just finished my build tonight and it sounds GREAT! A very versatile distortion. With the Range and Boost set low and the amp Gain up near full, you get a very convincing Brian May sound (well with the right guitar, pickups, Brian's talent etc. ). Can't wait to box my prototype!
You can substitute other transistors if you want (e.g. BS170 for the MOSFET) but mind the pinouts.
Have fun!
- 287m
- Breadboard Brother
oh shit, why i just see boost schemo
anyway, this is normal channel for you
===
Question :
Are Sprint user really just use some pict, load it and just tracing? Really easy like that?
and can clone whatever layout in speed of light?
Ask here, because i know there a lot of sprint user here.
And my friend who use sprint never talk much about this.
anyway, this is normal channel for you
===
Question :
Are Sprint user really just use some pict, load it and just tracing? Really easy like that?
and can clone whatever layout in speed of light?
Ask here, because i know there a lot of sprint user here.
And my friend who use sprint never talk much about this.
- Frank_NH
- Solder Soldier
In my project I used the ROG Omega as the booster:
http://www.runoffgroove.com/omega.html
Instead of the 4.7u cap at the output, I used just a single 1u cap, which becomes the input to the normal channel amp sim above. In my testing, the normal channel amp sim on its own is (like the real amp itself) very "wooly"; however, with a treble boost in front, it becomes a great distortion with lots of singing sustain and harmonics (like Brian May's tone).
http://www.runoffgroove.com/omega.html
Instead of the 4.7u cap at the output, I used just a single 1u cap, which becomes the input to the normal channel amp sim above. In my testing, the normal channel amp sim on its own is (like the real amp itself) very "wooly"; however, with a treble boost in front, it becomes a great distortion with lots of singing sustain and harmonics (like Brian May's tone).