Farfisa Repeat/Volume [schematic]
- theehman
- Diode Debunker
Information
Here's a monster of a pedal for you: the Farfisa Repeat/Volume. It's a Repeat Percussion effect with treadle-varied Rate that switches to a Volume pedal. I've had this for quite a while but I think I'm going to Ebay it or something so I figured I'd post some pics for you guys first. I have no schematic just yet but I'll see if I can work one up later today.
Ron Neely II
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
- theehman
- Diode Debunker
Information
No, it's a 2N2160.flatcrabs wrote:does this one use the 2n2646 like the Vox?
Schematic nearly done.
Ron Neely II
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
- theehman
- Diode Debunker
Information
Just realized I forgot to include the 10uF cap on the Unijunction. Please replace your schematic with this one:
Ron Neely II
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
- theehman
- Diode Debunker
Information
It's about the same, maybe just a bit softer on the percussion.flatcrabs wrote:Ron-
Thanks for the scheme! Does the Farfisa sound any different from the Vox?
Ron Neely II
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
Firstly apologies for dredging up a two year old thread but thankyou to the original poster this is really helpful to me.
I have a Mk1 Farfisa Compact Duo which lacks the repeat function that the later model had, so I am going to build this circuit to give me the extra function that Pink Floyd used on their later Farfisa.
My question was regarding the power supply to this circuit if anyone can help. Can I use a Boss type 9vdc adapter rather than a battery or will I need to add any current limiting components.
Best
Dave
I have a Mk1 Farfisa Compact Duo which lacks the repeat function that the later model had, so I am going to build this circuit to give me the extra function that Pink Floyd used on their later Farfisa.
My question was regarding the power supply to this circuit if anyone can help. Can I use a Boss type 9vdc adapter rather than a battery or will I need to add any current limiting components.
Best
Dave
- tube-exorcist
- Resistor Ronker
You can use a Boss adapter (or any 9V DC power supply) but I believe that you will be disappointed. The Farfisa Compact Duo "Repeat Percussion" function is completely different (made with a glow lamp and a LDR).Vintagekey1975 wrote:Firstly apologies for dredging up a two year old thread but thankyou to the original poster this is really helpful to me.
I have a Mk1 Farfisa Compact Duo which lacks the repeat function that the later model had, so I am going to build this circuit to give me the extra function that Pink Floyd used on their later Farfisa.
My question was regarding the power supply to this circuit if anyone can help. Can I use a Boss type 9vdc adapter rather than a battery or will I need to add any current limiting components.
Best
Dave
"I've noticed there's an inverse relationship between cost of gear and talent. If you need the most expensive gear to get decent tones, then you suck as a player."
That's a shame. I tried the North Effects repeat percussion but it was too noisy and different. The closest I have gotten is with a maxed out Boss TR-2. I will probably build this circuit any way just for sh!ts and giggles. A Compact Duo through a "gating effect" like the repeat and then through a vintage Small Stone Phaser sounds fantastic. I will have to go the whole hog and get a Mark II Compact Duo.
I'm rounding up components to build this circuit and just have the non electrolytic caps left to source. I wanted to check the values of them as I cannot find a 4700uF film cap anywhere. Are these in pF whereas the e-caps are in uF? I can clearly see 4700/10 on the cap in question in the photo.
Thanks again
Dave
Thanks again
Dave
- theehman
- Diode Debunker
Information
I'd assume that since I didn't put a polarity mark on it that it's 4700pF. I no longer have the unit to check.Vintagekey1975 wrote:I'm rounding up components to build this circuit and just have the non electrolytic caps left to source. I wanted to check the values of them as I cannot find a 4700uF film cap anywhere. Are these in pF whereas the e-caps are in uF? I can clearly see 4700/10 on the cap in question in the photo.
Thanks again
Dave
Ron Neely II
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
Electro-Harmonix info: http://electroharmonix.vintageusaguitars.com
Home of RonSound effects: http://www.ronsound.com
fx schematics and repairs
Once again apologies for dragging up an old thread. I am in the middle of building this circuit and have a little confusion over the 470K/100K rate pot symbol in the schematic. Could somebody explain to me whether I need a 470K or 100K pot with the other value being a fixed resistor?
Many thanks in advance
Dave.
Many thanks in advance
Dave.
- Nocentelli
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Has thanked: 1155 times
- Been thanked: 954 times
It appears to be a 100k pot with the wiper tied to one end (i.e. variable resistor) and a 470k in parallel with this variable 100k: I'm going to guess that this gives a taper that is more like reverse log, whichbtends to be more useful in rate controls (finer control at higher speeds).
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...