Dr. Z - Air Brake
FWIW, here's the schematic. I can't remember where I got it from.
John
John
- Attachments
-
- attenuator1_a1.pdf
- (11.01 KiB) Downloaded 2432 times
- JiM
- Diode Debunker
Information
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 22:56
- Completed builds: Completed builds :
Proco Rat
MXR MicroAmp in a volume pedal
TubeDriver (w/ NoS russian tube and big muff tone contol) + Phase 45 (w/ univibe cap ratio)
Dallas Rangemaster (w/ noisy OC75, negative ground)
SubCaster tube booster (w/ NoS russian tube, PtP)
Hot Harmonics
Music From Outer Space SubCommander in progress
Crackle Not OK
Simple bass blender in a 1590A
Bazz Fuss with a photo-darlington - Location: France
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
- Contact:
By the way, there is a guts picture right in the official manual !
http://www.drzamps.com/manuals/Airbrake.pdf
http://www.drzamps.com/manuals/Airbrake.pdf
I only give negative feedback.
- noelgrassy
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- Posts: 388
- Joined: 28 Nov 2007, 02:43
- my favorite amplifier: MOTS Magnatone & Trainwreck
- Completed builds: Tonebender Mk II w/ 3 OC75's, Burns BuzzAround w/NKT 275,Rangemaster w/ OC44, Fuzz Face w/ SKS363's, CJOD, Harmonic Percolator w/2N404A & 2N3635(vintage correct box,sliding pots, 1%glass resistors),Stack-O-Dimes & Whipple Wahs,
- Location: Vacuum Tube Valley, Cali
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
madditch wrote:I believe those resistors have an L-bracket attached to each end, at least the ones in my Dr Z air break do.
Yep, and when you order these resistors you must order 2 per wirewound resistor of these brackets 'cause they're
not included.
I eliminated the large rheostat on my build. For one it's something I could add later if I needed it. Second,
the folks who generated that first layout remarked that the tone changes at "bedroom" level were unacceptable.
madditch, do you find this to be so with your Trainwreck approved Airbrake?
Copyright does not protect facts, ideas, systems, or methods of operation, although it may protect the way these things are expressed. US Copyright Office
- soulsonic
- Old Solderhand
Information
All I can say is that it sure doesn't even begin to match impedances with the amp - if it's turned down all the way with a 16 ohm cab, the amp is seeing around 22ohms; with an 8 ohm cab it's still around 22 ohms... With the bedroom level set to 50%, it about 20 ohms with an 8 ohm cab, etc, etc... Any time you start messing with impedance mismatches like that it's bound to change the sound. Unfortunately, nearly all the commercial attenuators out there do it from one degree to another.
"Analog electronics in music is dead. Analog effects pedal design is a dead art." - Fran
- noelgrassy
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- Posts: 388
- Joined: 28 Nov 2007, 02:43
- my favorite amplifier: MOTS Magnatone & Trainwreck
- Completed builds: Tonebender Mk II w/ 3 OC75's, Burns BuzzAround w/NKT 275,Rangemaster w/ OC44, Fuzz Face w/ SKS363's, CJOD, Harmonic Percolator w/2N404A & 2N3635(vintage correct box,sliding pots, 1%glass resistors),Stack-O-Dimes & Whipple Wahs,
- Location: Vacuum Tube Valley, Cali
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
When I finished building the Airbrake, I found I was happier with this old-as-hell Altair with
pre-Flinstonian components. It doesn't fidjit with the tone to my ears.
Factory docs indicate a max of 6.6 L at any setting. Where does one measure the actual impedance
on an attenuator? Is this measured out of circuit? I meant, with the attenuator not driving a load.
That would involve reflected L's and equashums I'd bet.
I suppose that's math I've never performed before.
pre-Flinstonian components. It doesn't fidjit with the tone to my ears.
Factory docs indicate a max of 6.6 L at any setting. Where does one measure the actual impedance
on an attenuator? Is this measured out of circuit? I meant, with the attenuator not driving a load.
That would involve reflected L's and equashums I'd bet.
I suppose that's math I've never performed before.
- Attachments
-
- factory docs. indicate 6.6 Ohms max L
- 33275167_o.jpg (82.2 KiB) Viewed 7428 times
Copyright does not protect facts, ideas, systems, or methods of operation, although it may protect the way these things are expressed. US Copyright Office
- soulsonic
- Old Solderhand
Information
I always take the speaker into account when I calculate it because it's part of the complete circuit, and the amp definitely sees it when the thing is in use. To keep it simple, I just treat the speaker like a resistor and calculate the straight resistance of the whole circuit. Without knowing the actual values of the reactive elements of the other components, it isn't really possible to calculate the AC impedance of the circuit. The surest way to measure it would be to send signals through it at various frequencies and measure what comes up. I'm content with just dealing with the resistance because it will definitely let you know if you're in the ballpark. In my mind, the ideal attenuator would be purely resistive anyway, so that there wouldn't be any reactive components to interfere with the sound or kick bad mojo back at the amplifier. The speaker is reactive enough on its own - it really doesn't need any more added to it by a clunky attenuator. My opinion of course, but I say this after having played with reactive attenuators alot and not being too happy with the results.
I'd really like to see more of that Altair. I've never even heard of one before. I love studying attenuators.
I'd really like to see more of that Altair. I've never even heard of one before. I love studying attenuators.
"Analog electronics in music is dead. Analog effects pedal design is a dead art." - Fran
- noelgrassy
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- Posts: 388
- Joined: 28 Nov 2007, 02:43
- my favorite amplifier: MOTS Magnatone & Trainwreck
- Completed builds: Tonebender Mk II w/ 3 OC75's, Burns BuzzAround w/NKT 275,Rangemaster w/ OC44, Fuzz Face w/ SKS363's, CJOD, Harmonic Percolator w/2N404A & 2N3635(vintage correct box,sliding pots, 1%glass resistors),Stack-O-Dimes & Whipple Wahs,
- Location: Vacuum Tube Valley, Cali
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
soulsonic, Sir, we can put your call through now
This is a cleaner version of mine;
I'll get some gut shots of mine for you.
Some of the resistors resemble the heating element in a hair dryer.
This is a cleaner version of mine;
I'll get some gut shots of mine for you.
Some of the resistors resemble the heating element in a hair dryer.
Copyright does not protect facts, ideas, systems, or methods of operation, although it may protect the way these things are expressed. US Copyright Office
- bacaruda
- Breadboard Brother
I love my DIY Airbrake - use it all the time. The sound man is always telling me my 5E3 is too loud (HA!), so I usually dial in my tone with the Airbrake set 2 clicks down, then I have some room to increase my stage volume during the set without affecting my base tone too much. According to Ken Fischer, this was what the Aribrake was designed it for. It's not great for bedroom level attenuation (like any really are), but it's very transparent until the bedroom level is engaged.
Here's mine:
And here is a excellent graph Randall Aiken plotted showing the actual impedance of the Airbrake with various setups.
Here's mine:
And here is a excellent graph Randall Aiken plotted showing the actual impedance of the Airbrake with various setups.
The Atair and the Rockman Power Soak are attenuators from the '70th. Soundwise, if uses with tubeamps, are both plain crap like any attenuator working with big wattage Rs. Even on the 4db level the tone sucks with a tubeamp 'cos there's no feedback/reactance from the speaker(s) anymore. The sound is stiff and liveless, similar to a trannie amp.
Soundwise a lot better are the attenuators from Palmer and VHT.
IMHO the best sounding attenuaters for tube amps are from GT and Marshall. The Marshall Power Break is a bit different due to a tapped transformer in the output but as good as the others, but none of them sacrifice the sound of a tubeamp.
JHS
Soundwise a lot better are the attenuators from Palmer and VHT.
IMHO the best sounding attenuaters for tube amps are from GT and Marshall. The Marshall Power Break is a bit different due to a tapped transformer in the output but as good as the others, but none of them sacrifice the sound of a tubeamp.
JHS
very good idiagrams but doesnt specify the caps, knobs or brackets for the power resistors. I think i found some appropriate ones on mouser.com -the brakets are on the same catalogue page as the resistors and the theres loads of control knobs although it did take a while to find as mouser is BIG. Ill post product numbers when i can find them.
- dai h.
- Solder Soldier
I think you meant to say THD(?)JHS wrote:Soundwise a lot better are the attenuators from Palmer and VHT.
p.s. Have you heard the Palmer attenuator ("The Sponge")? Seems they were pretty rare.