How to wire variable input cap?
Hi all! I've done a few builds, a shin ei, bazz fuzz, electra, and a woolly mammoth.. So I decided to try maybe modding a familiar circuit to suit my tastes a little better... Here is what I have so far... Do I have everything hooked up ok?
- juanro
- Cap Cooler
Hi, if you're trying to mix between the 0.1u and 2.2u, yo have to swap them around... put the 0.1u fixed on the board, and the 2.2u over the potentiometer. With the current connection, you're adding 0.1u to the always connected 2.2u (turning it into a 2.3u total, not much difference). The other way you have a 0.1u input cap (the "standar" setting) and you mix in 2.2u ("fat" setting)
Regards
Juanro
Regards
Juanro
La única verdad es la realidad.
- Nocentelli
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Has thanked: 1152 times
- Been thanked: 954 times
That layout appears to have a 100k resistance permanently connected direct from input to Q1's base, i.e.from lug 1 to lug 3. I'm not sure how this might affect things, but every cap blend I've seen has the pot wired as a simple variable resistor (i.e. using only two lugs) directly in series with the larger value cap.
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...
It's actually the feedback resistor, and I was thinking about making that a pot as well...
- Nocentelli
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Has thanked: 1152 times
- Been thanked: 954 times
No, I don't mean the onboard resistor (although a pot here can work really well - I'd suggest a 10k fixed resistor in series with a 100k pot using lugs 1 and 2 only, i.e. as a variable resistor ), I mean the pot itself: If you trace the input signal, it will go into lug 1 and through 100k resistance (the pot's entire track) then out of lug 3 and on to the Q1 base. Like I said, I don't know how this would affect the performance of the circuit, but a standard cap blend looks like this:
The input goes to the small cap and straight to the transistor: it is also connected to lug2 and lug1 which are tied together. A parallel input signal encounters a series resistance set by the pot between lug2 and lug 3, where the signal is then sent through the larger cap to meet up with the direct "small cap signal".
The input goes to the small cap and straight to the transistor: it is also connected to lug2 and lug1 which are tied together. A parallel input signal encounters a series resistance set by the pot between lug2 and lug 3, where the signal is then sent through the larger cap to meet up with the direct "small cap signal".
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...
Nocentelli wrote:No, I don't mean the onboard resistor (although a pot here can work really well - I'd suggest a 10k fixed resistor in series with a 100k pot using lugs 1 and 2 only, i.e. as a variable resistor ), I mean the pot itself: If you trace the input signal, it will go into lug 1 and through 100k resistance (the pot's entire track) then out of lug 3 and on to the Q1 base. Like I said, I don't know how this would affect the performance of the circuit, but a standard cap blend looks like this:
The input goes to the small cap and straight to the transistor: it is also connected to lug2 and lug1 which are tied together. A parallel input signal encounters a series resistance set by the pot between lug2 and lug 3, where the signal is then sent through the larger cap to meet up with the direct "small cap signal".
I did this and I'm only getting sound out of the .001 cap, turning the pot does nothing, is this because the other cap is an electro? I'm assuming that's there as filtering, so removing it could have some ill effects..
My mistake, got it working. THANK YOU SO MUCH!
- Nocentelli
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Has thanked: 1152 times
- Been thanked: 954 times
Excellent: How does it sound?
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...
The input cap takes it from shin ei level nasaly snarl to doomy sludge goodness, thinking about raising the 2.2 to 4.7 and seeing what happens.Nocentelli wrote:Excellent: How does it sound?
The "bias" knob I wired, just a 100k pot as a variable resistor, takes me from regular fuzz tones to distortion/overdrive sounds depending on where the input cap is set.
I did assume that with hfe of 260 and 280 I would have a lot more gain on tap..
- Nocentelli
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Has thanked: 1152 times
- Been thanked: 954 times
Sounds like it's working as it should: you could probably increase the bigger input cap to 10uF for even more sludge, but higher than that and you won't notice much increase. As for the gain, amount of gain is pretty subjective - 2N2222s are at the lower end of the hfe scale, I tend to use BC109c for my fuzz circuits, they are more like 400 and up.nightendday wrote:I did assume that with hfe of 260 and 280 I would have a lot more gain on tap..
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...