Electro caps orientation
- Duckman
- Opamp Operator
I always read about "correct" electro caps orientation when you are designing a circuit, I mean, all positives (or negatives) leads pointing to the same PCB side. But, honestly, 99% of the stompboxes (standard or boutique) and/or photos I see, comfirm to my eyes that this is not a "golden rule". I wanna know if somebody has noticed or experimented a real improvement or even a perceptible difference between circuits that have "correct" or "incorrect" caps orientation.
Thanks to all!
Thanks to all!
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 596 times
- Been thanked: 2061 times
polarised electrolytic capacitors should always be connected with their positive terminals to the most positive dc voltage potential points when placing them in the circuit. For example - when using a polarised electrolytic capacitor as a coupling capacitor from a npn emitter, or n channel jfet source, being run as a buffer from a positive dc supply voltage, this point will usually be at approximately half the supply voltage (+4.5v dc when using a +9v dc supply), and so you should connect the positive terminal of the electrolytic capacitor to this point. The other terminal usually connects to a resistor (or potentiometer volume control etc.) which has it's other terminal; connected to ground and so is at zero dc potential.
Failure to observe the correct polarity will result in non linear distortion (not good!!) and possible destruction of the electrolytics dielectric (explosion if run from very high voltage )
Hope this helps
cheers
bajaman
Failure to observe the correct polarity will result in non linear distortion (not good!!) and possible destruction of the electrolytics dielectric (explosion if run from very high voltage )
Hope this helps
cheers
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- Duckman
- Opamp Operator
Tkx, Bajaman! Your posts are always very usefull, and one of my actual proyects are based in your info about Musicman Stingray pre. But, about the electros, I'm talking about phisical orientation, not electrical orientation. Any sonical or ellectrical advantage by placing all electros facing the same side? If not, I think I can save a lot of traces! Got the piont?
Big Thanks!!
Big Thanks!!
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 596 times
- Been thanked: 2061 times
No - none whatsoeverAny sonical or electrical advantage by placing all electros facing the same side?
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
- JiM
- Diode Debunker
Information
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 11 Mar 2008, 22:56
- Completed builds: Completed builds :
Proco Rat
MXR MicroAmp in a volume pedal
TubeDriver (w/ NoS russian tube and big muff tone contol) + Phase 45 (w/ univibe cap ratio)
Dallas Rangemaster (w/ noisy OC75, negative ground)
SubCaster tube booster (w/ NoS russian tube, PtP)
Hot Harmonics
Music From Outer Space SubCommander in progress
Crackle Not OK
Simple bass blender in a 1590A
Bazz Fuss with a photo-darlington - Location: France
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
- Contact:
The only advantage is from a manufacturing point of view : it's less error-prone, and easier to check.Duckman wrote:Any sonical or ellectrical advantage by placing all electros facing the same side?
It might also be an unintentionnal side effect of all negative leads being connected to the same ground strip.
I only give negative feedback.
- Duckman
- Opamp Operator
Well, since my level of manufacture are very low... what a relief to me! I found myself few times re-tracing and re-re-tracing designs only to keep electro caps "well" oriented. Any way, it's not an error in the end and, in certain way, looks neat, like those guys who place components very simetrically (only Antelope come to my mind now) but, this is another theme.
Tkx JiM!
Tkx JiM!