How to wire two effects in parallel inside the box?

All frequent questions on switching: true or not true bypass, transistor-based or mechanical.
Post Reply
User avatar
grrrunge
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 810
Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:51
Completed builds: Loads!
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 206 times
Contact:

Post by grrrunge »

The bass player from one of my bands and i tried out some different distortions/overdrives for his bass the other day. He ended up being madly in love with the sound of my modded BOSS SD-1 in parallel with a EHX Linear Power Boost. We talked about building a pedal for him, and i suppose that would be pretty cheap and easy, as musikding carries pcb's for both the SD-1 and the LPB.

I imagine a box with content as follows:

buffer pcb: http://www.musikding.de/product_info.ph ... r-kit.html
LPB pcb: http://www.musikding.de/product_info.ph ... r-kit.html
SD-1 pcb: http://www.musikding.de/product_info.ph ... e-kit.html

input -> buffer pcb -> SD-1 and LPB in parallel -> output

My questions are:
1: Can i just wire the output from the two pcb's together at the output jack?
2: Is the input buffer overkill? I just thought it's a nice thing to have :)

Thanks in advance,
/grrrunge
A true believer in the magic of Sherwood Forest Pedal Pirates
---
New base of operations: http://www.knucklehead.dk

User avatar
reneshelle
Solder Soldier
Information
Posts: 184
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 11:28
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Post by reneshelle »

How did you do it with the actual pedals? You could do it the same way inside the box, unless you used something like a boss ls-2 to blend them.

But is it not more or less a modded tubescreamer/sd-1 with a clean blend pot you're after? Might be easier to do that with only one board...

I don't know if it's overkill with the input-buffer, but if you're doing the sd-1+lpb1 thing then perhaps some sort of mixingstage at the output? But I don't know if you really need it.

User avatar
grrrunge
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 810
Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:51
Completed builds: Loads!
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 206 times
Contact:

Post by grrrunge »

We talked about some sort of blend knob, but agreed that both pedals have a volume knob already, so used in conjunction they act like some sort of mixer stage already.

We tested the bass through an off metal zone for the buffer, y cable into LPB and SD-1 and then their respective outputs into a DOD 240 passive mixer as we didn't have more y cables...
A true believer in the magic of Sherwood Forest Pedal Pirates
---
New base of operations: http://www.knucklehead.dk

User avatar
reneshelle
Solder Soldier
Information
Posts: 184
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 11:28
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Post by reneshelle »

If you used a DOD 240 you're already "wiring" the two outputs together. As far as I remember the 240 is totally pasive, meaning no buffers and just volume controls going to ground. So it seems fine to just connect the outputs.

As far as the input buffer go. It's not much of a problem installing it, and you could make it always on and just true bypassing the two effects if you wished. Might be nice if your friend uses pasive bass guitars...

If you skip the buffer the "two" inputs will load the signal more than if it's just one. But that might not be a problem at all for him, especially if he uses active electronics in the instruments...

User avatar
Nocentelli
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 2222
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
Location: Leeds, UK
Has thanked: 1152 times
Been thanked: 954 times

Post by Nocentelli »

grrrunge wrote:We tested the bass through an off metal zone for the buffer, y cable into LPB and SD-1 and then their respective outputs into a DOD 240 passive mixer as we didn't have more y cables...
i'm similarly interested in this kind of scheme, as i'm planning a parallel trem+vibrato. from what i've read, some sort of input buffer/splitter circuit will do the trick, and you might get away with a simple passive mixer pot on the output, particularly if both circuits have an output level pot. i'd be inclined to make both boards, hook up the bass into the amz buffer/splitter muamp jobby, send two parallel output signals to the two boards, and wire the outputs of the two boards to lugs 1+3 of a linear pot, with lug 2 as the outpu: i'm guessing you could even just replicate this pot set at 50% with two 50k resistors on the ends of each output, and tie them as the output, as you said, the two volume controls should allow you to balance them. If there is any weird interaction, you might need to investigate an output mixer/buffer bloc.
modman wrote: Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...

User avatar
frequencycentral
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 696
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 09:37
Location: United Kingdom
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by frequencycentral »

If I was doing this I'd buffer the hell out of it. IMO an output bufer is essential or there is going to be interaction. I'd probably adapt something like the Bblender to do the job - two of everything, 5 opamps.

Post Reply