Earthquaker Devices - Monarch revision 2 - 2011 [gut shot]

General documentation, gut shot, schematic links, ongoing circuit tracing, deep thoughts ... all about boutique stompboxes.

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby Nocentelli » 16 Apr 2014, 08:55

johnk wrote:I built up my vero of it and it sounds great. the only thing is, is that it seems to have less gain than the video demos that I've seen. otherwise it's awesome.
if I can find a way to up the drive/dirt, it'll be perfect.


So, the pietro_moog schematic with 100r to ground off the source of lower muamp JFET?
brownwhopping wrote:How can I learn by reading threads an making circuits, when some day I can see a lawsuit or somebody beat me in the face for that?
User avatar
Nocentelli
Tube Twister
 
Posts: 2104
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 08:06
Location: Leeds, UK
Has thanked: 881 times
Have thanks: 848 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby stevo83 » 16 Apr 2014, 14:50

johnk wrote:I built up my vero of it and it sounds great. the only thing is, is that it seems to have less gain than the video demos that I've seen. otherwise it's awesome.
if I can find a way to up the drive/dirt, it'll be perfect.


I had one for a while and I noticed the same thing. The gain did seem lower than as heard in demos etc.

I also remember that like most JFet drives it responded very well to boosters (esp treble boosters) though.
stevo83
 
Posts: 37
Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 00:28
Has thanked: 8 times
Have thanks: 6 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby johnk » 16 Apr 2014, 15:00

Nocentelli wrote:
johnk wrote:I built up my vero of it and it sounds great. the only thing is, is that it seems to have less gain than the video demos that I've seen. otherwise it's awesome.
if I can find a way to up the drive/dirt, it'll be perfect.


So, the pietro_moog schematic with 100r to ground off the source of lower muamp JFET?


yep.

here's my vero layout for it:
Image

For this message the author johnk has received thanks: 2
Manfred (16 Apr 2014, 17:32), tp801 (17 Apr 2014, 16:56)
johnk
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 08:33
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 272 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby pietro_moog » 16 Apr 2014, 15:10

in the end i might be tempted to build this. i'm slowly looking for a new overdrive and the monarch may be interesting. the 470nf cap out of the bs170 could be much lower, like even 22nf, without any signal band loss.
pietro_moog
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 99
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 20:00
Has thanked: 7 times
Have thanks: 44 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby Intripped » 16 Apr 2014, 15:12

so is it for sure that the 22n and 2,2n caps have to be swapped?
Didi&Stulle made a trascription error then.

and by the way, i made an error as well concerning the hidden top-layer traces - this is the corrected version (how it could/should be):
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Intripped
Cap Cooler
 
Posts: 495
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 02:03
Location: Italy
Has thanked: 600 times
Have thanks: 216 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby pietro_moog » 16 Apr 2014, 15:35

in the end you can fix the eq as you want. but if you want the orange mark you should use their eq. take a look at the orange graphic schematic on the net.
duncan tone stack simulator is also a big help to design your own eq.

For this message the author pietro_moog has received thanks:
Intripped (16 Apr 2014, 15:51)
pietro_moog
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 99
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 20:00
Has thanked: 7 times
Have thanks: 44 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby Intripped » 16 Apr 2014, 15:51

yep, looking at the orange tonestack right now, you're right.
i assumed the caps' values written by the op were correct, but now it's clear that they are not.

Pietro, what do you think of the 100E resistor on the mu-amp? is it a reasonable value?
Intripped
Cap Cooler
 
Posts: 495
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 02:03
Location: Italy
Has thanked: 600 times
Have thanks: 216 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby johnk » 16 Apr 2014, 16:01

Intripped wrote:so is it for sure that the 22n and 2,2n caps have to be swapped?
Didi&Stulle made a trascription error then.


yes.
johnk
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 08:33
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 272 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby johnk » 16 Apr 2014, 16:05

an actual orange amp has a 330p gain bypass cap instead of a 470p.
and the treble pot caps are 1n5 and a 10n as opposed to a 1n and 4n7.
these are also the values used in the citrus graphic pedal.
johnk
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 08:33
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 272 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby pietro_moog » 16 Apr 2014, 16:15

mmm.. i don't know. i'm not an expert of mu amps, but if it's volume you are after you can act on the voltage divider on the output.
if you want gain,personally, i'd go for the 330Ω resistor on the bs170. the point is that the eq cut a lot of signal (every tone stack does it), so we could place a 500Ω trimmer on there (or sockets and resistors) and regulate the gain that way. we also could add a 9.1v zener like Zvex does.
however, if the revision 1 has 100Ω on the mu amp i guess it's ok.
pietro_moog
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 99
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 20:00
Has thanked: 7 times
Have thanks: 44 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby johnk » 16 Apr 2014, 16:18

so using the schematic posted earlier, here's a working schematic with the actual orange cap values for the eq and gain pot bypass cap:
Image

larger pic:
http://johnkvintageguitars.homestead.co ... ues-01.jpg
johnk
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 08:33
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 272 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby pietro_moog » 16 Apr 2014, 16:33

johnk wrote:so using the schematic posted earlier, here's a working schematic with the actual orange cap values for the eq and gain pot bypass cap:
[ Image ]

larger pic:
http://johnkvintageguitars.homestead.co ... ues-01.jpg



actually c14 should be 1nf instead of 1uf.
however, let's try to do at least 1 schematic adherent to this pedal. c10 is 1n, c13 in 4,7nf. c16 is 470pf. you can alter everything you want to custom it on your need.
personally i would make the first stage like a zvex sho with a 500ohm trimmer, i would make c9 something like 47nf or 22nf and remove c16.
those caps make everything under half of the gain pot so tiny that i can not stand it.
but that's my opinion
pietro_moog
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 99
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 20:00
Has thanked: 7 times
Have thanks: 44 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby johnk » 16 Apr 2014, 16:58

okay, with the posted values of this pedal, I suppose that it should be like this:
Image
bigger pic:
http://johnkvintageguitars.homestead.co ... emo-04.jpg

IME, a 1n for C14 is going to make it sound too thin for my taste, and judging by the pics, the size of that cap is awfully large for a 1n so i'm still not completely convinced that 1n is the correct value.

For this message the author johnk has received thanks:
Manfred (16 Apr 2014, 17:30)
johnk
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 08:33
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 272 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby pietro_moog » 16 Apr 2014, 17:05

you might be right. that cap looks pretty big. in the end this is a very tunable circuit.
pietro_moog
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 99
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 20:00
Has thanked: 7 times
Have thanks: 44 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby johnk » 17 Apr 2014, 03:23

well, I replaced C14 in my build with a 1n and to my surprise it didn't cut the low end much at all so maybe 1n is the correct cap value.
so this vero follows the schematic properly:
Image

Image

lager pic of the schematic:
http://johnkvintageguitars.homestead.co ... emo-04.jpg

For this message the author johnk has received thanks: 5
dbat69 (17 Apr 2014, 12:39), jubal81 (17 Apr 2014, 06:24), Manfred (17 Apr 2014, 15:50), onebuzz (29 May 2015, 23:05), tp801 (17 Apr 2014, 16:59)
johnk
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 08:33
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 272 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby marshmellow » 17 Apr 2014, 11:01

Both Q2 and Q4 should have gate resistors. Q4 is fixed by connecting C14 to ground instead of the gate. That's also how it is marked on the photo I think. For correct biasing of Q2 I would leave out C7 completely. It will work as drawn in the schematic to a certain extent, and it might be part of the sound, so I would just give it a try and see what it does.
marshmellow
Cap Cooler
 
Posts: 456
Joined: 16 Aug 2007, 08:31
Location: Germany
Has thanked: 14 times
Have thanks: 123 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby johnk » 29 Jun 2014, 04:54

I have an original Monarch here to compare with the schematic. it turns out that R17 is a 1K (by looking at the color bands and measuring it) and R19 is a 470K (not a 47K).
after making those two small changes, A/B'd my clone of it and they sound identical now. thanks for posting the schematic!

Image

For this message the author johnk has received thanks:
jubal81 (29 Jun 2014, 18:25)
johnk
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 08:33
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 272 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby erikm5150 » 30 Jun 2014, 20:07

johnk wrote:I have an original Monarch here to compare with the schematic. it turns out that R17 is a 1K (by looking at the color bands and measuring it) and R19 is a 470K (not a 47K).
after making those two small changes, A/B'd my clone of it and they sound identical now. thanks for posting the schematic!


Just curious, how's the noise level of your vero build compared to the original?
erikm5150
 
Posts: 37
Joined: 30 Dec 2007, 17:45
Has thanked: 7 times
Have thanks: 1 time

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby johnk » 30 Jun 2014, 21:37

they're identical. neither one is noisy.
johnk
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 276
Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 08:33
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 272 times

Re: earthquaker devices monarch [gut shot]

Postby pietro_moog » 29 Jul 2014, 09:42

i finally built this pedal and i'm not sure i like it. it is kinda low gain, i was expecting much more..
pietro_moog
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 99
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 20:00
Has thanked: 7 times
Have thanks: 44 times

PreviousNext

Return to Boutique Stompboxes dissected...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests