Bearfoot - Honey Bee  [traced]

General documentation, gut shot, schematic links, ongoing circuit tracing, deep thoughts ... all about boutique stompboxes.
User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

eda123 wrote:whats with all the spots for missing components?
I was going to post something about this exact topic but found this thread. The PCB's for the Honey Bee, Dyna Red and Model H are all the same...just different spots filled. That being said, I like the way the Bearfoot version sounds. I may be going deaf (and this is from memory)...

BJF Honey Bee - Liked it a lot but it seemed a little anemic in the low end when playing at low volumes. Output was also seemed low.

Mad Professor Honey Bee - A little better in the low end and output improved but fizzy sounding.

Bearfoot Honey Bee - Nicest low end out of the bunch, smoother sounding (like the original) and nice amount of output.

Of course, YMMV.
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

Seiche wrote:so can someone summarize the differences between the bearfoot and the bjfe version one more time, as this thread has been butchered since ibodog has left the building. :|
Referencing the Yellow Shark schematic...

C5 - 220n in series with a 4.7k resistor.
C10 - 22n

Q1 - 2N5952

R3 - 14.7k
R9 - 150k
R11 - 2.61k
R14 - 47r
R16 - 47k
R17 - 47K
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
Seiche
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 2526
Joined: 01 Nov 2010, 00:16
Location: Germany
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Post by Seiche »

The Rotagilla wrote:Mad Professor Honey Bee - A little better in the low end and output improved but fizzy sounding.
There is no such thing. You mean the Sweet Honey OD, which is totally different from the Honey Bee schematicwise-

User avatar
Seiche
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 2526
Joined: 01 Nov 2010, 00:16
Location: Germany
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Post by Seiche »

The Rotagilla wrote:C5 - 220n in series with a 4.7k resistor.
C10 - 22n
Q1 - 2N5952
R3 - 14.7k
R9 - 150k
R11 - 2.61k
R14 - 47r
R16 - 47k
R17 - 47K
too late, already built the HB the way WKH told me :lol:
next one'll be done that way... maybe...

User avatar
WhiteKeyHole
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 546
Joined: 05 Apr 2008, 04:38
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 220 times

Post by WhiteKeyHole »

Compare those "different" values with the BJFE's (Yellow Shark schematic) and their function/behavior in the circuit. I didn't bother with most of them for a reason.

I had initially included "R9" as different but, as was later discovered, it is the same value (147K/150K) in the BJFE Honey Bee that was dissected.

You might notice some slight difference by changing C10 (and C4).

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

Seiche wrote:
The Rotagilla wrote:Mad Professor Honey Bee - A little better in the low end and output improved but fizzy sounding.
There is no such thing. You mean the Sweet Honey OD, which is totally different from the Honey Bee schematicwise-
You're right, my mistake. A thousand pardons. :thumbsup
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

WhiteKeyHole wrote:Compare those "different" values with the BJFE's (Yellow Shark schematic) and their function/behavior in the circuit. I didn't bother with most of them for a reason.

I had initially included "R9" as different but, as was later discovered, it is the same value (147K/150K) in the BJFE Honey Bee that was dissected.

You might notice some slight difference by changing C10 (and C4).
I was just posting what I found for educational purposes. :thumbsup
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
Seiche
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 2526
Joined: 01 Nov 2010, 00:16
Location: Germany
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Post by Seiche »

The Rotagilla wrote:
Seiche wrote:
The Rotagilla wrote:Mad Professor Honey Bee - A little better in the low end and output improved but fizzy sounding.
There is no such thing. You mean the Sweet Honey OD, which is totally different from the Honey Bee schematicwise-
You're right, my mistake. A thousand pardons. :thumbsup
upon rereading what i wrote, i realised that my tone could be interpreted as pretty harsh. Apologies! It was simply meant as a FYI :hug:

other than that, it's good to know all the right values, because if you build one after the bearfoot version, why not use the right ones?
I noticed that Björn is still insisting that the schematic of the HB is wrong and the clones sounds nothing like the real thing.

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

Seiche wrote:
The Rotagilla wrote:
Seiche wrote:
The Rotagilla wrote:Mad Professor Honey Bee - A little better in the low end and output improved but fizzy sounding.
There is no such thing. You mean the Sweet Honey OD, which is totally different from the Honey Bee schematicwise-
You're right, my mistake. A thousand pardons. :thumbsup
upon rereading what i wrote, i realised that my tone could be interpreted as pretty harsh. Apologies! It was simply meant as a FYI :hug:

other than that, it's good to know all the right values, because if you build one after the bearfoot version, why not use the right ones?
I noticed that Björn is still insisting that the schematic of the HB is wrong and the clones sounds nothing like the real thing.
No worries. :thumbsup I don't contribute much but thrown in some stuff when I can. I had a chance to look at what I thought was one of the better sounding Honey Bees I've tried and thought I'd post the results. I will say that I really liked the Mint Green Mini Vibe as well. I took a quick look at it and there was a lot going on and it wasn't mine to take apart so unfortunately I could not grab pics. It would have been a tough one to decipher from the pics as all the resistors were loaded on end almost completely obscurring the circuit board. Bottom line, it was different enough sounding to be cool and I would definitely spring for one.
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
Seiche
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 2526
Joined: 01 Nov 2010, 00:16
Location: Germany
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Post by Seiche »

The Rotagilla wrote:I will say that I really liked the Mint Green Mini Vibe as well. I took a quick look at it and there was a lot going on and it wasn't mine to take apart so unfortunately I could not grab pics. It would have been a tough one to decipher from the pics as all the resistors were loaded on end almost completely obscurring the circuit board. Bottom line, it was different enough sounding to be cool and I would definitely spring for one.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=15613&hilit=mint+green+vibe

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

Seiche wrote:
The Rotagilla wrote:I will say that I really liked the Mint Green Mini Vibe as well. I took a quick look at it and there was a lot going on and it wasn't mine to take apart so unfortunately I could not grab pics. It would have been a tough one to decipher from the pics as all the resistors were loaded on end almost completely obscurring the circuit board. Bottom line, it was different enough sounding to be cool and I would definitely spring for one.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=15613&hilit=mint+green+vibe
Yup, that's what I saw. :D
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

mmolteratx wrote:Did this double sided layout up for PCB mounted pots that will fit in a 1590B. I'm gonna just toss it in the Dorkbot group buy and figured others might want to do the same. So here are the Eagle files. All I request is absolutely no commercial use. No for profit cloning, period.

Image

Schem: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8021347/HBOD.sch
Board: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8021347/HBOD.brd
I have a question about mmolteratx's layout. In order to submit the layout for fabrication for my own usage, aren't there more files needed than just the .brd file? I apologize if this is a foolish question, I'm still trying to get the hang of Eagle. I did contact mmoleratx about the spares he had but have not heard back. Thanks for the help!
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

I Dorkbot'd mmolteratx's layout which works perfectly (thank you sir!) and build the circuit with the changes I noted. The only only change I made was to sub the red LED's with MA150 diodes. I'm not a big fan of LED's for clipping as they seem to decay unevenly to my ears, the MA150's have a smoother decay. All in all this is a cool little pedal, sounds great with a Tele.
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
mmolteratx
Degoop Doctor
Information
Posts: 508
Joined: 19 Dec 2009, 01:50
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 619 times

Post by mmolteratx »

FWIW, there is one error with the layout, though it won't affect the sound. The power filtering is screwed up and there's none for the V+ and reduced filtering for the Vb. Not even sure how that one happened as the scheme shows the correct connections and no inconsistencies were brought up when I used the ERC function. Anyways, I'll upload an updated version in a day or two.

And ya, it's a great circuit to use with a Tele. Though TBH, everything sounds great with a Tele. :wink:

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

Reviving a long dead thread for a question. Any way to bump up the output on this circuit, I'd like a little more available volume on tap. Thanks.
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
Groovenut
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 299
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 16:31
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Post by Groovenut »

The Rotagilla wrote:Reviving a long dead thread for a question. Any way to bump up the output on this circuit, I'd like a little more available volume on tap. Thanks.
Change the R13 C12 combo by reducing the resistance of R13 but increasing C12 by the same ratio. ie reduce R13 by 10X and increase C12 by 10X. This will maintain the freq knee but reduce the effect of R13 on the output.

User avatar
The Rotagilla
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 Aug 2007, 18:24
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by The Rotagilla »

Groovenut wrote:
The Rotagilla wrote:Reviving a long dead thread for a question. Any way to bump up the output on this circuit, I'd like a little more available volume on tap. Thanks.
Change the R13 C12 combo by reducing the resistance of R13 but increasing C12 by the same ratio. ie reduce R13 by 10X and increase C12 by 10X. This will maintain the freq knee but reduce the effect of R13 on the output.
Cool, thanks!
The television will not be revolutionized.

User avatar
guitarist
Information
Posts: 9
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 11:54

Post by guitarist »

I came upon this looking to boost the output as well.

What values approx. did you come up with (just prior to the last level pot)? 4.7K and 47n area?
I doubt adding a 50k resistor tagged on the ground of the 50k pot might add a bit too?

Post Reply