Zvex - Box of Rock  [traced]

General documentation, gut shot, schematic links, ongoing circuit tracing, deep thoughts ... all about boutique stompboxes.

Zvex - Box of Rock  [traced]

Postby modman » 27 Jun 2007, 15:41

Last edited by modman on 23 Jul 2007, 15:24, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
modman
a d m i n
 
Posts: 4301
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 17:57
Has thanked: 3108 times
Have thanks: 549 times

Postby bajaman » 27 Jun 2007, 21:43

Hi friends
One mistake? with the Box Of Crock schematic :)
The 10n on the tone control should be 100n :)
Otherwise everything from the drain of the third mosfet to the output would not be the same as the BSIABII :lol: :lol: :lol:
Did you spot the Marshall circuit snippet in there :?: :roll:
(470k parallelled with 470pf) a treble boosting filter used by Jim before the great Z was probably born :shock: :lol:
Back to the Future again AG :roll:
Okay then - what is this last mosfet gain stage?
Is it - no it can't be... but..... yes - it is another SHO stage :lol: :lol: :lol:
Cheers Steve

ps: I wonder if he paid any royalties to Ed Guidry and his designer friends for DIRECTLY copying there tone control and output filter design :wink:
(that is assuming this schematic is correct!)
User avatar
bajaman
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 4282
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 22:18
Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
Has thanked: 420 times
Have thanks: 1461 times

Postby analogguru » 27 Jun 2007, 21:54

I wonder if he paid any royalties to Ed Guidry and his designer friends for DIRECTLY copying there tone control and output filter design


I don´t think so, somebody wrote me this:

I found it funny that Zach Vex copied the 'back end' of the BSIAB component-for-component. Is this really correct?
If so, I don't resent it, I posted the schematic, after all. I'm actually kind of flattered that he used it.


The rest is private talk....

analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.

For this message the author analogguru has received thanks:
modman (19 Aug 2012, 21:52)
analogguru
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 14:58
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 116 times

Postby tuemmueh » 11 Jul 2007, 20:09

Thank you, igloo, looks cool to me!
tuemmueh
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 166
Joined: 27 Jun 2007, 00:30
Has thanked: 7 times
Have thanks: 2 times

Postby briggs » 12 Jul 2007, 20:14

I think it's quite funny. Every time you buy a zvx you are basically buying a multiple of the SHO - x2 x3 x4! C'mon Z give us something to get excited about!
User avatar
briggs
Tube Twister
 
Posts: 1997
Joined: 12 Jul 2007, 11:02
Location: Breaking into Heaven.
Has thanked: 30 times
Have thanks: 124 times

Postby daz » 15 Jul 2007, 07:43

Hey Igloo thanks for perf layout. Is it verified?
daz
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 50
Joined: 12 Jul 2007, 01:13
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 7 times

Postby Igloo » 15 Jul 2007, 07:55

It is a new draw.
Two people have carefully checked it and it looks good.
See at the top of the thread the schematic?
Check for yourself! :wink:
I am keen to hear any build reports. :
Igloo
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 171
Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 10:33
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times

Postby bajaman » 15 Jul 2007, 08:46

I cannot see any layout???
The original schematic at the top of the thread cannot be correct with that 10n in the tone control surely???
I think it needs to be 100n - to match the BSIABII circuit - can someone confirm please!!!
Cheers
Steve
User avatar
bajaman
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 4282
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 22:18
Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
Has thanked: 420 times
Have thanks: 1461 times

Postby Igloo » 15 Jul 2007, 09:27

Image
Igloo
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 171
Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 10:33
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 2 times

Postby invictus » 19 Jul 2007, 15:03

.

i built this circuit based on the first layout (by FcKw) posted above, i used 100n cap at the tone part...


both the FckW and Igloo's layout is not same as the schematic posted here... (100n tone cap and 47K output resistor)

as soon as somebody verify the actual values used in the commercially available units, i will update the schematic and post it here for everybody's reference.

anyway, the circuit using 100n tone cap sounds quite nice... i didnt try 10n... it sounds...uhmm.... it sounds like 4 cascaded SHOs :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

with maximum drive at low volume settings, i couldnt get enough grainy distortion, so i tried pushing it with a clean boost from the eternity clone i built recently... there, im satisfied... :D

.. thanks guys for the info. someone please verify the actual values so we could update the schematic posted.


.
User avatar
invictus
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 128
Joined: 29 Jun 2007, 08:55
Location: between 20Hz - 20,000Hz
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 1 time

Postby analogguru » 19 Jul 2007, 15:30

100n seems to be the correct value for the tone control.... This would fit to the BSIAB II.... but who knows ? In boutique-pedals you can find many things.... sometimes also cloning-mistakes. I know one unit which was sold for years as a 100% clone, until the builder found one of my schematic... Now the unit has been updated :wink:

If the Zvex Octane schematic shows the real content of the unit, then i assume, Zvex never has seen a real unit, only the printed schematic which contains mistakes. Also the printed Kay Fuzztone schematic supplied with the unit is incorrect. If you take this schematic for cloning...it wil never be a real clone. Sunn Buzz factory schematic is incorrect....the list can be continued.

Since the output capacitor is 10µF (nobody knows why) it doesn´t make a difference to the unit itself if the output resistor is 47k or 100k. (even with only 47k the LF-response will be linear down to approx. 2 Hz and the load difference on the output stage is neglicible). Maybe it can have an influence on the following guitar amp if this guitar amp has no DC-decoupling and no 68k input resistors.....only then.

analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.
analogguru
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 14:58
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 116 times

Postby analogguru » 23 Jul 2007, 18:17

There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.

For this message the author analogguru has received thanks:
modman (19 Aug 2012, 21:53)
analogguru
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 14:58
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 116 times


Postby madbean » 25 Jul 2007, 04:05

I've got a verified pcb layout of the dirt side of the schematic (I didn't put the boost in) if anyone is interested and it's kosher. I've built it but not boxed it so it's verified.
madbean
 

Postby madbean » 25 Jul 2007, 15:09

Image
madbean
 

Postby markm » 25 Jul 2007, 15:20

madbean wrote:I've got a verified pcb layout of the dirt side of the schematic (I didn't put the boost in) if anyone is interested and it's kosher. I've built it but not boxed it so it's verified.


Nice!
I was going to do mine without the boost too.
User avatar
markm
Diode Debunker
 
Posts: 787
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 15:41
Location: U.S.A.
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 8 times

Postby briggs » 25 Jul 2007, 16:56

Nice stuff bean, very clean layout! When are you releasing your stuff? Can we have a go at de-gooping that :wink:
Image

I am Klon.
User avatar
briggs
Tube Twister
 
Posts: 1997
Joined: 12 Jul 2007, 11:02
Location: Breaking into Heaven.
Has thanked: 30 times
Have thanks: 124 times

Postby goaltoday » 26 Jul 2007, 15:26

More guts:

PCB side
2
3

On th first pic there's a resistor added (not in the original) to the volume pot in order to "taper" from linear to audio.

For this message the author goaltoday has received thanks:
modman (19 Aug 2012, 21:53)
goaltoday
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 96
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 11:02
Location: Spain
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 1 time

Postby JHS » 29 Jul 2007, 18:15

Interesting that ZV switched to Fairchild BS170.
I was on the NS-site and IMHO they don't manufacture those Mosfets anymore.

JHS
JHS
Cap Cooler
 
Posts: 484
Joined: 14 Jul 2007, 12:20
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 3 times

Postby alnico » 29 Jul 2007, 22:59

I like post #55 from the HC thread:

I know it is more ££'s, etc, but a Super Duper 2 in 1 (or a SHO) in front of the Box of Rock is a wonderful thing. The BoR responds wonderfully to it, and really does give you full on gain that is controllable from your volume.


Maybe that'll be the next design - just keep adding SHOs!
User avatar
alnico
 
Posts: 40
Joined: 30 Jun 2007, 12:42
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 5 times

Next

Return to Boutique Stompboxes dissected...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot], JabboWookie and 7 guests