Alternatives for PT2399?

Looking for a particular component or hardware part and you just cannot find it? Got comoonents surplus and want to get rid of it? Post it all here... No sales of working pedals, put these in the 'Seen for sale' section please.

Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby A1full » 08 Mar 2015, 16:05

Hello there any other integrated as the PT2399 to make a delay? I have not found any, except the old giving a low repetitions.
A1full
 
Posts: 33
Joined: 17 Jan 2012, 18:00
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 4 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby mictester » 12 Mar 2015, 23:58

There are many echo / delay ICs available - both analogue (BBD) and digital. However, there's nothing wrong with the 2399 if you use it properly.
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"
User avatar
mictester
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 2868
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 21:29
Location: In the hills of North London
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 767 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby Intripped » 13 Mar 2015, 12:13

I'm interested in alternatives to the pt2399 as well

What I don't like of the pt2399 is the kind of white noise (shhhhh) that is audible with the repetitions, even at relatively short delay times. You can lower the intensity of this noise, but it's hard (or maybe impossible?) to get completely rid of it
I know there are some people who don't hear this noise, but I really do; probably is one of those things that once noted you cannot ignore anymore.

I know there is the FV1, but I've never experimented with this chip.
Does anyone here know how is the FV1 compared to the PT?
Intripped
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 437
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 02:03
Has thanked: 469 times
Have thanks: 202 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby ~arph » 13 Mar 2015, 16:57

Well, I do not think there are ICs available that are comparable with the PT2399 in regards to ease of use for the average DIY'er

The strong point of the PT2399 is that it is a simple IC. With easy delay time adjustment and can be used in a full analog environment.
Using BBD's is trickier, requires biasing and an external clock (I do not know how they compare price wise)
Using digital ics like the FV-1 requires coding, flashing and sometimes even eternal memory ics to store your program and/or audio data.

The PT2399 is in a very good niche.
In the quiet words of the virgin Mary: "Come again?"
User avatar
~arph
Cap Cooler
 
Posts: 601
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 11:35
Has thanked: 62 times
Have thanks: 164 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby Duckman » 13 Mar 2015, 20:55

Just for pure curiosity: does anyone tried stacked 2399's? :scratch:
User avatar
Duckman
Opamp Operator
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 20 May 2009, 02:45
Has thanked: 364 times
Have thanks: 121 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby mictester » 13 Mar 2015, 21:22

Do you mean one on top of another, wired pin for pin? No. I haven't tried it, and it's unlikely to work. It also wouldn't reduce the noise....

I've found that if you give about 150µs pre-emphasis on the way in and the corresponding de-emphasis on the way out, you reduce the noise significantly while retaining a (more or less) flat frequency response. It's also essential to avoid clipping in the IC (there are several ways to prevent that). I also use a compander to compress on the way in and expand on the way out. I don't much like the sound of a single delay line, so I use three or four in parallel, each with different delays, and with convoluted feedback paths so that I get a whole mess of delayed signals at different repeat rates. If the straight to echoed signal ratio is set sensibly, I get a truly lovely "hall" echo effect at longer delay settings and smaller room sounds at shorter settings. I ended up using some preset resistors for the delay times, and selected them with 4066 ICs. One pedal that I make and I really like the sound of has short, medium and long preset delays, variable straight to echo ratio on a from panel pot and a "master feedback" pot to vary the overall amount of recirculated echoes. It uses both noise reduction tricks, four 2399s and has "tails". I've built a few of them now and their owners adore them! I'll put the basic circuit up on this site shortly.
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"

For this message the author mictester has received thanks: 3
Duckman (14 Mar 2015, 02:22), jubal81 (14 Mar 2015, 05:28), tabbycat (14 May 2015, 08:54)
User avatar
mictester
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 2868
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 21:29
Location: In the hills of North London
Has thanked: 32 times
Have thanks: 767 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby A1full » 13 Mar 2015, 23:52

mictester wrote:Do you mean one on top of another, wired pin for pin? No. I haven't tried it, and it's unlikely to work. It also wouldn't reduce the noise....

I've found that if you give about 150µs pre-emphasis on the way in and the corresponding de-emphasis on the way out, you reduce the noise significantly while retaining a (more or less) flat frequency response. It's also essential to avoid clipping in the IC (there are several ways to prevent that). I also use a compander to compress on the way in and expand on the way out. I don't much like the sound of a single delay line, so I use three or four in parallel, each with different delays, and with convoluted feedback paths so that I get a whole mess of delayed signals at different repeat rates. If the straight to echoed signal ratio is set sensibly, I get a truly lovely "hall" echo effect at longer delay settings and smaller room sounds at shorter settings. I ended up using some preset resistors for the delay times, and selected them with 4066 ICs. One pedal that I make and I really like the sound of has short, medium and long preset delays, variable straight to echo ratio on a from panel pot and a "master feedback" pot to vary the overall amount of recirculated echoes. It uses both noise reduction tricks, four 2399s and has "tails". I've built a few of them now and their owners adore them! I'll put the basic circuit up on this site shortly.



Well you're an expert with the PT2399, in my opinion has a sound medium quality is far from quality digital delay as Tc electronics, t rex or Strymon. It would be good if you can show us how to better sound.
thanks for your answer
A1full
 
Posts: 33
Joined: 17 Jan 2012, 18:00
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 4 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby karul » 14 Mar 2015, 15:58

Deadastronaut jamming on his prototype with 4 PT2399 delay prototype on breadboard.

Link


Another example is madbeans Zero Point SDX Delay

Link


Another one: cpm's - delay over the top PT2399's
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_so ... ID=8355105
viewtopic.php?f=28&t=9648

Haven't you noticed that there are lot of commercial delay/reverb pedals using belton brick(s) wich are nothing more than 3 PT2399's
karul
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 202
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 21:28
Has thanked: 146 times
Have thanks: 130 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby karul » 14 Mar 2015, 18:09

I've forgot to mention that some of the techniques and concepts Mictester have mentioned in his replay are used in examples above - so you can hear how good or bad PT2399 can be.

For this message the author karul has received thanks:
Duckman (14 Mar 2015, 21:52)
karul
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 202
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 21:28
Has thanked: 146 times
Have thanks: 130 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby A1full » 15 Mar 2015, 04:53

karul wrote:Deadastronaut jamming on his prototype with 4 PT2399 delay prototype on breadboard.

Link


Another example is madbeans Zero Point SDX Delay

Link


Another one: cpm's - delay over the top PT2399's
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_so ... ID=8355105
viewtopic.php?f=28&t=9648

Haven't you noticed that there are lot of commercial delay/reverb pedals using belton brick(s) wich are nothing more than 3 PT2399's


The sound quality is not the best, of course is not a dsp, but wondered why some intermediate alternative, other than the PT2399 or switch to a dsp for something better, in the middle there is nothing?
A1full
 
Posts: 33
Joined: 17 Jan 2012, 18:00
Has thanked: 1 time
Have thanks: 4 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby karul » 15 Mar 2015, 15:40

A1full wrote:but wondered why some intermediate alternative, other than the PT2399 or switch to a dsp for something better, in the middle there is nothing?


Answer was already given.
mictester wrote:There are many echo / delay ICs available - both analogue (BBD) and digital. However, there's nothing wrong with the 2399 if you use it properly.


Search for BBD IC's.

For example, most common BBD chips come from Panasonic/Matsushita MN3xxx series:
http://www.electrosmash.com/mn3007-buck ... de-devices

MN3005 - Ibanez AD-80, BOSS DM-2, Electro Harmonix Memory Man, etc

-----------------------------------------

You may not like those pedals either.
karul
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 202
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 21:28
Has thanked: 146 times
Have thanks: 130 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby Duckman » 15 Mar 2015, 23:38

Some very interesting considerations about 2399's here:

http://sound.westhost.com/project26a.htm

For this message the author Duckman has received thanks: 2
Intripped (16 Mar 2015, 00:11), tabbycat (14 May 2015, 08:56)
User avatar
Duckman
Opamp Operator
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 20 May 2009, 02:45
Has thanked: 364 times
Have thanks: 121 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby Mbas974 » 15 Mar 2015, 23:47

I think PT is still the best DIY solution fo a good delay.

..what I do not understand is the delay for work stacked PT;
I have on breadborad this http://postimg.org/image/zdho7og5z/
and I supposed to get min delay of 250ms (2x 125ms as per 6K8+1K resistence..) well the min delay is clearly under 100ns...

I'd like someone could explain how this "current mirror" circuit as well..THANKS
Mbas974
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 283
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 13:13
Has thanked: 40 times
Have thanks: 40 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby Dirk_Hendrik » 16 Mar 2015, 16:02

Perhaps cascade the delaylines instead of physically placing em in parallel?
After that, that's not a current mirror. That's 2 transistors which sink current to ground. Because they happen to be connected to a similar source in the PT chip and are controled by the same pot they will sink similar currents.... but not as a mirrror.



(And can those who keep op soldering IC's in parallell please stop?)
Sorry. Plain out of planes.

http://www.dirk-hendrik.com
User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 4088
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 09:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 243 times
Have thanks: 971 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby tabbycat » 14 May 2015, 09:05

you could maybe do something building on the belton brick and pt2399 idea. maybe take the schematic of the brick and twist it around a bit as a discrete unit rather than the stock brick. add another pt2399, put layers of dirt between them, or modulate one one way and the next another way to make a mutant brick. kind of as mictester was sugesting but take the standard brick schematic as your start point template and tweak it beyond recognition.

karul listed a couple of brick pedals above, another is the eqd ghost echo of which i'm a big fan. a massive space on tap.
"be a good animal, true to your instincts" (d.h. lawrence).
"there is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion" (francis bacon).
"ni dieu ni maître" (anarchist slogan).
User avatar
tabbycat
Cap Cooler
 
Posts: 519
Joined: 03 Jul 2011, 01:09
Location: i could tell you but i'd have to kill you.
Has thanked: 227 times
Have thanks: 61 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby matt239 » 17 Sep 2015, 08:39

mictester wrote:I've found that if you give about 150µs pre-emphasis on the way in and the corresponding de-emphasis on the way out, you reduce the noise significantly while retaining a (more or less) flat frequency response. It's also essential to avoid clipping in the IC (there are several ways to prevent that). I also use a compander to compress on the way in and expand on the way out.


"150µs pre-emphasis?" What are you saying there?

Care to share some of your other tricks for getting this chip to work well?
Thanks. :)
matt239
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 215
Joined: 11 Sep 2010, 19:54
Has thanked: 61 times
Have thanks: 5 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby Dirk_Hendrik » 17 Sep 2015, 09:28

he's saying 150µs pre-emphasis.

1) find out what pre-and deemphasis is. Hint: every Boss and Ibanez analog delay show examples
2) find out why filters can be determined as having a delay time (hint: An allpass filter is delay-only)
Sorry. Plain out of planes.

http://www.dirk-hendrik.com

For this message the author Dirk_Hendrik has received thanks:
Intripped (18 Sep 2015, 00:16)
User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 4088
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 09:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 243 times
Have thanks: 971 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby matt239 » 18 Sep 2015, 22:27

I get the basic concept of pre & de-emphasis. I just didn't know why he was describing it in micro-seconds, and was hoping he would expand on that.

I was dimly aware that filters cause delay..
Alas, my filter kung fu is not strong..

I wasn't saying he was saying it wrong, just that I was not understanding.
matt239
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 215
Joined: 11 Sep 2010, 19:54
Has thanked: 61 times
Have thanks: 5 times

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby Darth Florist » 22 Sep 2015, 23:55

If you still want to stick with Bucket Brigade Devices, someone is STILL manufacturing Panasonic MN3102 and MN3207 chips. Try your luck at...

support@truetone.com
I like Stomp Boxes. I also like Pedals (which, to me, are different to Stomp Boxes) and Synthesisers (never say that with a lisp), BUT...

I LOVE MELLOTRONS!

I have an M400 Mellotron, serial number 360.
Darth Florist
 
Posts: 8
Joined: 14 Jul 2015, 22:00
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Has thanked: 2 times
Have thanks: 0 time

Re: Alternatives for PT2399?

Postby matt239 » 24 Sep 2015, 04:14

... filters have delay...
and that filters only filter because of time constants,
and that frequency = period, so it's a time thing.

It's just not the shorthand we normally use around here to describe simple stompboxes.
Why not just say it's 1kHz?

P.S.: it's (about) 1kHz.

- I'm only a simple un-frozen-caveman guitar player..
matt239
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 215
Joined: 11 Sep 2010, 19:54
Has thanked: 61 times
Have thanks: 5 times

Next

Return to Parts Sourcing & Trading

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], chordball and 4 guests