New fuzz face V original ones

All about modern commercial stompbox circuits from Electro Harmonix over MXR, Boss and Ibanez into the nineties.
Post Reply
User avatar
ChrisFFTA
Breadboard Brother
Information
Posts: 99
Joined: 30 Dec 2007, 07:43
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by ChrisFFTA »

Now there is quite a resounding agreement that the new fuzz faces suck ass... but how different are they from the originals? I am thinking of getting a GGG clone... is it pure original mojo or will it sound like the newer reissues?

User avatar
Fuzzer
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 982
Joined: 16 Sep 2007, 15:17
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Fuzzer »

The blue one (Jimi Hendrix Brand) is good, it sounds good to me, its Silicon.

I don't know if the red ones are worth.
The Freestompboxes Forum search function is soo great, use the search function..., the S E A R C H function.

User avatar
earthtonesaudio
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1244
Joined: 28 Jan 2008, 04:00
Completed builds: Metal Simplex, Fuzz Factory, two Fab Echos-modded, Noisy Cricket, Earth & Space Wah, TS-7-modded, passive xover/splitter box, opamp fuzz
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Post by earthtonesaudio »

The thing about the originals is that they varied widely from one unit to the next. Some sounded great, others not so much. Mainly this was due to two reasons: the use of germanium transistors, and the minimum components configuration. Ge varies a lot from device to device, so that makes each one different even if every other part was the same. Si devices vary also, but not nearly as bad as Ge. Combine that with the fact that FF's are made with like 10 components, and each component begins to have a greater influence on the sound. I'm not saying the passive devices have mojo tone or anything, but the circuit's simplicity makes part tolerance on each part matter more.

Now hopefully the reissues were based on "good" originals, but there's a chance the reissues are accurate copies of the bad sounding originals! In either case, the new ones are probably more consistent from one to the next, due to tighter tolerances on components, and possibly also due to extra circuitry to compensate for device variation and tailor the frequency response to be like the original.

I don't know what the original "good sounding" ones sounded like, since I've never had a chance to play one, neither do I know what the new ones sound like. All I've heard in the way of FF's have been ones I've made on the breadboard.


Check out GEOFEX:
http://www.geofex.com/Article_Folders/f ... fffram.htm
rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.

User avatar
bumblebee
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 736
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 00:05
my favorite amplifier: ‘65 Twin Reverb
Completed builds: Fuzz & Preamps mostly.
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Post by bumblebee »

At least if you make one you know you CAN get it to sound good. Smallbear sells tested Ge transistors for the FF, and he ships the correct resistor values with them too so you can bias it right, you might want to look into that. You can also get just the PCB from GGG.
I so dislike the modern digital world that I need to use semi-digital effects to emulate the analog world of cassette, VHS, and vinyl.

Post Reply