rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.
HydrozeenElectronics wrote:You might want to ad a phase switch to each channel, I was doing something similar and phasing became a real problem.
Dogue wrote:Should I have another signal splitter at the very front of the chain, before the distortion, and then have one output go to the distortion and the second output go to the mixer?
HydrozeenElectronics wrote:You might want to ad a phase switch to each channel, I was doing something similar and phasing became a real problem.
rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.
Yes. Beware of overloading the opamp though (hence the 18V power supply for higher headroom).Dogue wrote:Is it possible to expand that to 8 inputs using the same TL071?
You're right, except not as variable resistors in series, but as voltage dividers. Just like volume controls.Dogue wrote:Edit: I'd also like to have individual level controls for each input. Assuming I keep the other values the same, should I then insert 100k Audio Pots in series with R1?
This mixer inverts, but maybe your fuzz, octaves and "Weird thing" also do. So there's no single answer. You can tweak the splitter to provide an inverted signal if needed : take the output from the collector, like a cathodyne phase splitter in old tube amps.Dogue wrote:Furthermore, the output signals, including the clean, will all be inverted, correct? So if other effects are used in parallel there is risk of phase cancellation?
rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.
In which case do I still use the part of the circuit as is between the DC in and the TL071?earthtonesaudio wrote:Audio taper volume controls going into the mixer should let you attenuate enough so you don't need 18V. Just run the whole lot off 9V.
rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.
rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests