Lovepedal Silicon Fuzzmaster [traced]
- rmroza
- Breadboard Brother
...ok, I just reviewed as a second set of eyes the PCB layout to schematic. They look good. A couple minor things...the diode D1 is actually D9 on the PCB layout, BOM, and original. Also after R11 on the CB C13 comes first, so on the schematic C5 and C13 would be swapped (not an expert, so no sure if that matters).
The PCB layout may need one amendment, bt it won't affect the schematic or vero here. I just noted that I have R4 to ground before going to the switch, but don't think that is correct. Likewise, not sure why the switch 7 and 8 position go nowhere, so the switch would go to nowhere and no where or switch to nowhere and thru R4 to the the switch! That doesn't make any sense. Pin 8 of the switch probably should go to ground and like I said remove ground from R4 and just flow from the switch and if ground thru the resistor to the LED!
Again, no issues with the schematic or vero layout!
Ok, off to de-populate and make the new board!
Eqinox
The PCB layout may need one amendment, bt it won't affect the schematic or vero here. I just noted that I have R4 to ground before going to the switch, but don't think that is correct. Likewise, not sure why the switch 7 and 8 position go nowhere, so the switch would go to nowhere and no where or switch to nowhere and thru R4 to the the switch! That doesn't make any sense. Pin 8 of the switch probably should go to ground and like I said remove ground from R4 and just flow from the switch and if ground thru the resistor to the LED!
Again, no issues with the schematic or vero layout!
Ok, off to de-populate and make the new board!
Eqinox
- IvIark
- Tube Twister
Information
Yes I'd figured there was still an error with the LED in the PCB layout, lug 8 of the switch needs grounding and R4 isn't grounded or the LED will always be on, as per the schematic. The position of C5 and C13 on the schematic don't matter, they're both directly connected to the supply rail and ground.
"If anyone is a 'genius' for putting jacks in such a pedal in the only spot where they could physically fit, then I assume I too am a genius for correctly inserting my legs into my pants this morning." - candletears7 - TGP
- rmroza
- Breadboard Brother
Thanks IvIark
Looks like it should be a go then! The parts I ordered should be in tomorrow, so I should be able to slam it together after work!
Thanks for everyone's support!
Equinox
Looks like it should be a go then! The parts I ordered should be in tomorrow, so I should be able to slam it together after work!
Thanks for everyone's support!
Equinox
- rmroza
- Breadboard Brother
Ok, old board de-populated and new board populated with leads. I just need the pots tomorrow. Off to do graphics and get the box ready. Jimi goes on this one fo-sho!
I added the two columns and used the Bourns 3386 trimmers as I said I would. I used all caps and everything as the original as-is. We'll see what happens tomorrow. Enjoy!
Equinox
I added the two columns and used the Bourns 3386 trimmers as I said I would. I used all caps and everything as the original as-is. We'll see what happens tomorrow. Enjoy!
Equinox
- rmroza
- Breadboard Brother
Good morning!
Did anyone verify this yet??
I slammed it together last night, but it didn't work! I finished late and had to go to sleep, so no time to troubleshoot.
I'm pretty busy until Sunday now, so it will be a few more days on my end.
Let me know. Else, I will have to troubleshoot and desolder the entire board again one last time. I hope it's just a solder bridge or something on my end.
Equinox
Did anyone verify this yet??
I slammed it together last night, but it didn't work! I finished late and had to go to sleep, so no time to troubleshoot.
I'm pretty busy until Sunday now, so it will be a few more days on my end.
Let me know. Else, I will have to troubleshoot and desolder the entire board again one last time. I hope it's just a solder bridge or something on my end.
Equinox
- IvIark
- Tube Twister
Information
Yes Ravian Arp made one on my blog.
"If anyone is a 'genius' for putting jacks in such a pedal in the only spot where they could physically fit, then I assume I too am a genius for correctly inserting my legs into my pants this morning." - candletears7 - TGP
- IvIark
- Tube Twister
Information
Oh it's you!
Yes but the original layout with that wire link is exactly the same as the new layout, so I'm comfortable enough that if one works the other will. Equinox, post a higher res front and back pic of the board just so you can get a few extra sets of eyes looking at it for you.
Yes but the original layout with that wire link is exactly the same as the new layout, so I'm comfortable enough that if one works the other will. Equinox, post a higher res front and back pic of the board just so you can get a few extra sets of eyes looking at it for you.
"If anyone is a 'genius' for putting jacks in such a pedal in the only spot where they could physically fit, then I assume I too am a genius for correctly inserting my legs into my pants this morning." - candletears7 - TGP
- rmroza
- Breadboard Brother
Cool. Glad it worked and it verified! What do you think?? I like it!
Yeah, it's probably just a solder bridge or something, but let me take it apart and if needed post pic(s).
EQ
Yeah, it's probably just a solder bridge or something, but let me take it apart and if needed post pic(s).
EQ
Just got it working on a breadboard. I didn't get to play around with it too much yet, but sounds very nice. I haven't built any FF type circuit before, but wow is this touch sensitive!
At first I left out the 220uF filter cap, because I didn't have one. Big Huge Mistake! The thing non-stop howled and oscillated like crazy! I thought this cap was only needed for noisy power supplies or something, but then I started searching for info and realized it has something to do with getting certain negative ground PNP circuits to avoid this behaviour.
One question: How subtle, or not, should the blend pot be? And should it be noticeable mainly at higher gain settings?
At first I left out the 220uF filter cap, because I didn't have one. Big Huge Mistake! The thing non-stop howled and oscillated like crazy! I thought this cap was only needed for noisy power supplies or something, but then I started searching for info and realized it has something to do with getting certain negative ground PNP circuits to avoid this behaviour.
One question: How subtle, or not, should the blend pot be? And should it be noticeable mainly at higher gain settings?
Thanks, I have the Blend control working nicely. Now I just need to get a reverse log pot for the Drive control. I only have a Linear pot for now, and it doesn't do anything until the end of its range. Or maybe it's time to finally read the geofx article that talks about tapering resistors.
- Nocentelli
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Has thanked: 1155 times
- Been thanked: 954 times
Definitely worth a read, but in a nutshell, I think you could get a decent reverse log 1k drive pot using a 5k linear pot with lug three connected as per the schem, lug 2 via a 1k2 to ground, and lug 1 to ground.Yonatan wrote:Or maybe it's time to finally read the geofx article that talks about tapering resistors.
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...
This is still sitting on my breadboard, and I noticed that the different versions of the schematic seem very different around the path to V+ from the emitter of the 2nd transistor.
Can anyone explain the difference between them?
The original schematic posted (no revision marked on it) looks like a typical fuzz face circuit: The last one posted (marked revision 3) looks different. The cap is in series with pot, and there are resistors in parallel with cap/pot:
Can anyone explain the difference between them?
The original schematic posted (no revision marked on it) looks like a typical fuzz face circuit: The last one posted (marked revision 3) looks different. The cap is in series with pot, and there are resistors in parallel with cap/pot:
- Nocentelli
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Has thanked: 1155 times
- Been thanked: 954 times
The first one is identical to a standard fuzzface (DC bias fixed, AC bias variable between an effective 1k and zero k), the second gives a DC bias variable from 1k5 to 1k and an AC bias of 500ohms to zero ohms.... I think.
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...
Still have this on the breadboard. I want to perf it, but one thing is bothering me. Instead of 1.46V, I'm seeing a few volts (can't remember, 3 or 4 I think). Any idea why? I built to schematic except that I used BC212 instead of 2N3906. The circuit sounds fine to me, though I don't have anything to compare it with.rmroza wrote: Q1:
1 - 1.46V
2 - 6.62v
3 - 7.24V
Q2:
1 - 6.62V
2 - 7.48V
3 - 7.93V
- IvIark
- Tube Twister
Information
Yes give it a go, it'll be interesting to hear what you think of the results
"If anyone is a 'genius' for putting jacks in such a pedal in the only spot where they could physically fit, then I assume I too am a genius for correctly inserting my legs into my pants this morning." - candletears7 - TGP