Rams Head Big Muff FS36999 hFE measured
I would like to start by saying my post here is purely informational in nature. I've had the chance to actually measure the hfe of the FS36999 transistors in a Rams Head Big Muff. It needed new pots and all new electrolytic caps. Only one of the org. pots came with the pedal and it was coded for 1974. I have often wanted to measure these and I'm not saying that these are typical of every BM out there, only that this is what my particular one out of the 1000's made read on my Peak DCA55. I'm not trying to say that these are required mojo trannys. It's purely to document what these FS36999 happen to measure. All 4 were lot code 335 and measurements were made at room temperature. All components were removed from the transistors pcb traces for the measurements.
Q4: 163, Q3: 214, Q2: 171, Q1: 160
Q4: 163, Q3: 214, Q2: 171, Q1: 160
I bought this big muff as a fixer upper. Whoever owned it before me tried to put new pots on it and did a terrible job. They messed up the wiring so bad that when I first got it home, it wouldn't even work. I installed three new pots, fixed the wiring, played it and it sounded like crap. I then went ahead and unsoldered one of the 10uf electrolytic caps, tested it and it was bad. So I replaced all 3 10uf caps, reassembled it and it worked fine. I played it like that for a while but I was never really happy with the sound. This particular Big Muff circuit had 10uf caps at C1, C2, C13, a .05uf cap at C7 and a .0068uf tone cap at C8. It had a TON of low end, lots of bass...too much for my taste anyway. So, seeing how this Big muff was not an un-molested collector piece, I modified it with all .1uf caps and a .01 cap at C8. Basically I made it a clone of the Violet BM circuit; and it I LOVE it now. It's one of my favorites. I have made many Big Muff clones in the past, and I have made them with all kinds of transistors: 2N5088, BC239C, 2N3635, SE4010, MPSA18 and 2N5133. For me, I've found that I prefer the Big Muff sound with slightly lower gain transistors, around 150-250hFE. In my opinion, their really isn't that much difference in the sound until the hFE gets below 100-125. I have tested using gains as low as 75-80 hfe and it still sounded ok.
- electrosonic
- Breadboard Brother
Can you accurately measure transistor specs in circuit? I would think you would need to remove them from the circuit to get accurate measurements.
Andrew.
Andrew.
- lolbou
- Old Solderhand
+1 Remove these from circuit to use the DCA Analyser.electrosonic wrote:Can you accurately measure transistor specs in circuit? I would think you would need to remove them from the circuit to get accurate measurements.
Andrew.
- Are you a mod or a rocker?
- Uh, no, I'm a mocker.
- Uh, no, I'm a mocker.
- modman
- a d m i n
Information
- Posts: 4890
- Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 16:57
- Has thanked: 4394 times
- Been thanked: 2131 times
lolbou wrote:+1 Remove these from circuit to use the DCA Analyser.electrosonic wrote:Can you accurately measure transistor specs in circuit? I would think you would need to remove them from the circuit to get accurate measurements.
Andrew.
Probably so as not to damage the transistor in desoldering.All components were removed from the transistors pcb traces for the measurements.
But it's no problem that you document the gain in the transistors of a vintage unit.
It's not even a problem that you use pics: but they needn't be 1MB...
If somethings going to kill the forum it's the 10GB of attachments.
Please, support freestompboxes.org on Patreon for just 1 pcb per year! Or donate directly through PayPal
Modman, sorry for the large file size on the pics, I deleted them and will re-post with smaller files. I'm not as keen with computer software, I'm more of a hardware guy https://www.freestompboxes.org/posting.p ... 9&p=256465#modman wrote:lolbou wrote:+1 Remove these from circuit to use the DCA Analyser.electrosonic wrote:Can you accurately measure transistor specs in circuit? I would think you would need to remove them from the circuit to get accurate measurements.
Andrew.Probably so as not to damage the transistor in desoldering.All components were removed from the transistors pcb traces for the measurements.
But it's no problem that you document the gain in the transistors of a vintage unit.
It's not even a problem that you use pics: but they needn't be 1MB...
If somethings going to kill the forum it's the 10GB of attachments.
You are exactly right about me not wanting to risk damage to the transistors in de-soldering. Instead, all surrounding components were removed from the traces leading to the emitter, base, and collector of each transistor as you can see in the pics. It is much easier to de-solder and remove these other component as the leads are not as long and are mostly going straight though the board.
I made a small typo in my last post, I meant to say I have made BM clones using 2N3565 trannys, not 2N3635.
- modman
- a d m i n
Information
- Posts: 4890
- Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 16:57
- Has thanked: 4394 times
- Been thanked: 2131 times
http://musikding.rocks/wbb/index.php/Th ... #post69872Doc Holiday on Musikding forum 27-10-2005 wrote:Yes, yes ... the magical FS36999 from the old Big Muff's. To make a long story short - this transistor does not exist and there was never !!! Sounds funny, I know, but is so. Here the story that, by the way, I got from Mike Matthews personally. FS36999s are quite simply 2N5088s, nothing more. EH had bought these transistors in large quantities and had them specially printed with FS36999 to drive the competition crazy. Later Muff's (RAM are thus head version, etc.) are then printed with FS36999 German (!!!) BC239 transistors.
I also very long searched for it and then unceremoniously desoldered transistors from my Triangle Big Muff and studied, I have this almost at nothing done ... X, Digital Curve tracers, HFE measurement etc. And I can from the result only MM confirm's statement ===> FS36999 = 2N5088 from the 70's !!!
but then again:
Skreddy on Offsetguitars.com forum wrote:Here's what a BC239 and a 2N5088 both look like:
[ Image ]
This is called a TO-92 package.
Here's what an FS36999 looks like:
[ Image ]
This is called a TO-106 package.
There were never any 2N5088's or BC239's made in TO-106 packages. The FS36999 is almost certainly a rebranded 2N5133, and Mike likely purchased them on the surplus market like he did so many other parts that had date codes of circa 1968 on his circa 1971 BMP's. Maybe a 60's TV mfg had them custom numbered, but I do not think Mike had the money to have custom transistors made for him at that time.
http://www.offsetguitars.com/forums/vie ... 87#p628489
Please, support freestompboxes.org on Patreon for just 1 pcb per year! Or donate directly through PayPal
- Bernardduur
- Transistor Tuner
These FS36999 transistors are really 2N5133; I just fixed a '73 Ramshead Big Muff that had a transistor that was partially printed as 2N5133 and partially FS36999
'No more....... loud music.......'
Follow my love for pedals and amps on https://bernardduur.blogspot.com and https://www.instagram.com/bernardduur1
Follow my love for pedals and amps on https://bernardduur.blogspot.com and https://www.instagram.com/bernardduur1
- HamishR
- Breadboard Brother
I have built various versions of Big Muff with lower gain transistors - 2N2222A and 2N3904 - and really liked the results. But then I usually play them at lower gain levels, ie gain not much further up than 8-9.00. The lower gain trannies give a smooth, fat buttery sound rather than the buzz saw of the higher gain trannies. Obviously both are valid, but I really like the creamy responsiveness of the lower gain trannies.
More and more I am leaving off the second gain stage's clipping diodes too - if you're into that syrupy, vocal Gilmour tone you will probably enjoy these mods. You get more touch responsiveness. I got the idea about the clipping diodes from the Supa Tone Fuzz.
More and more I am leaving off the second gain stage's clipping diodes too - if you're into that syrupy, vocal Gilmour tone you will probably enjoy these mods. You get more touch responsiveness. I got the idea about the clipping diodes from the Supa Tone Fuzz.
- mictester
- Old Solderhand
Information
It's worth making the diodes switchable! I omit the first pair in some modes - and I replace them with Schottky types in others. The biggest range of tonal changes with this circuit is by changing the diodes and using low hfe transistors. I built a run of these using CA3049 transistor arrays, which have transistors with gains of around 75 - 100. I'd also recommend this chip for building reproductions of the Univox "Super Fuzz", since the original transistors in the Japanese boards were 2SC828, which are pretty low gain.HamishR wrote:I have built various versions of Big Muff with lower gain transistors - 2N2222A and 2N3904 - and really liked the results. But then I usually play them at lower gain levels, ie gain not much further up than 8-9.00. The lower gain trannies give a smooth, fat buttery sound rather than the buzz saw of the higher gain trannies. Obviously both are valid, but I really like the creamy responsiveness of the lower gain trannies.
More and more I am leaving off the second gain stage's clipping diodes too - if you're into that syrupy, vocal Gilmour tone you will probably enjoy these mods. You get more touch responsiveness. I got the idea about the clipping diodes from the Supa Tone Fuzz.
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"
- HamishR
- Breadboard Brother
I used to make the diodes switchable. Reason I stopped is that with higher gain transistors the change was not so noticeable - definitely it had an effect but I always prefered the lower gain setting anyway. And while it's more noticeable with lower gain trannies I still prefer the lower fuzz setting!
Thanks for sharing that!! Very cool find indeed. It has been a few years since I originally posted this and I have worked on several more old big muffs in that time. Some had 2N5133 and others had FS36999 but they all had Hfe between 120 to 180 when measured. One might have hit 200 if I recall correctly. Kind of funny how everyone back in the early 2000's thought these vintage muffs all had insanely high hfe transistors in them.Bernardduur wrote:These FS36999 transistors are really 2N5133; I just fixed a '73 Ramshead Big Muff that had a transistor that was partially printed as 2N5133 and partially FS36999
- BMS1971
- Solder Soldier
My personal '73 have 4 2N5133. Personally my favorites transistors are or 2N5133 (vintage) or BC229C and B for more modern sound.
By the way anyone tried the Motorola 2N5133 TO-18? They seams to be a little more high Hfe than the epoxy ones from Fairchild
Benoit
By the way anyone tried the Motorola 2N5133 TO-18? They seams to be a little more high Hfe than the epoxy ones from Fairchild
Benoit
- andy-h-h
- Breadboard Brother
Information
I recently made one with old glob top 2N3565 Transistors and it sounds killer. It’s now my favourite muff. Tone wise it’s more polite - creamy, less buzz, with a much wider range of usable sounds.